[Bug fortran/58100] Spurious DO loop at (1) will be executed zero times warning

2013-08-28 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58100 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/58100] Spurious DO loop at (1) will be executed zero times warning

2013-08-22 Thread roland.kaufmann at uni dot no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58100 --- Comment #5 from Roland Kaufmann roland.kaufmann at uni dot no --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #3) Roland: Is the new warning option -W(no-)zerotrip sufficient for you? As a general principle: I believe that the compiler should

[Bug fortran/58100] Spurious DO loop at (1) will be executed zero times warning

2013-08-19 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58100 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- In principle, we could also introduce a !GCC$ NOWARN directive, which could suppress all warnings on the following statement. I'm not volunteering, though :-)

[Bug fortran/58100] Spurious DO loop at (1) will be executed zero times warning

2013-08-18 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58100 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc

[Bug fortran/58100] Spurious DO loop at (1) will be executed zero times warning

2013-08-17 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58100 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc

[Bug fortran/58100] Spurious DO loop at (1) will be executed zero times warning

2013-08-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58100 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW