https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58200
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58200
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|dominiq at lps dot ens.fr |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58200
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
RFA posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-01/msg00142.html.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58200
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> IMO it would be better to add new sections for (2) and (3), put (2) after 2.3
> and () after 2.5.
IMO it would be better to add new sections for (2) and (3), put (2) after 2.3
and (3) after 2.5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58200
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> With most portable compilers, code generation options are traditionally
> used for variations in the target interface, and not to introduce
> functionality. Worse, the top-level entry says:
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58200
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58200
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
