http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58469
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58469
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Oct 4 16:25:55 2013
New Revision: 203207
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203207&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-10-04 Tobias Burnus
Backport from mainline
2013-09
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58469
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Sep 25 19:54:12 2013
New Revision: 202922
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202922&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-25 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/57697
PR fortran/58
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58469
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #0)
> Additionally, I wonder what the code should print - 20 or 42. With the
> current code (plus patch) and with crayftn it prints 20. (ifort and pgf95
> segfault.) I h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58469
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.3
Target Milestone|---
