https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58586
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58586
--- Comment #8 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Mon Jul 6 10:26:12 2015
New Revision: 225447
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225447&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2015-07-06 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58586
--- Comment #7 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Hm, ok, these are not just in a single file, cannot promise that I will be able
to look into them. :(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58586
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Contrary to Dominique's comment in
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894#c30
> adding the patch in
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-04/msg00058.html
> on top of r222970 doesn't b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58586
--- Comment #5 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Contrary to Dominique's comment in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894#c30
adding the patch in
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-04/msg00058.html
on top of r222970 doesn't break our code, an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58586
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #4 from ve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58586
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Further reduction:
type :: b
integer, allocatable :: a
end type
call add(b(null()))
contains
subroutine add (c)
type(b), value :: c
end subroutine
end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58586
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[OOP] ICE with derived type |ICE with derived type with