[Bug fortran/58913] Segmentation fault on real128 array

2013-11-24 Thread rrodrigues at poli dot ufrj.br
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913 Rodrigo Rodrigues changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/58913] Segmentation fault on real128 array

2013-11-24 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913 --- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Remove myself from cc list.

[Bug fortran/58913] Segmentation fault on real128 array

2013-11-12 Thread rrodrigues at poli dot ufrj.br
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913 --- Comment #10 from Rodrigo Rodrigues --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #8) > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 08:39:15PM +, rrodrigues at poli dot ufrj.br > wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913 > > > > --- Comment #7

[Bug fortran/58913] Segmentation fault on real128 array

2013-10-29 Thread rrodrigues at poli dot ufrj.br
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913 --- Comment #9 from Rodrigo Rodrigues --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #8) > Unfortnately, your trace suggests to me that this is MingW > specific. I can't help beyond this point. Prehaps, ping > the MingW developers? Yeah, I have to

[Bug fortran/58913] Segmentation fault on real128 array

2013-10-29 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913 --- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 08:39:15PM +, rrodrigues at poli dot ufrj.br wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913 > > --- Comment #7 from Rodrigo Rodrigues --- > Here goes the backtrack: > >

[Bug fortran/58913] Segmentation fault on real128 array

2013-10-29 Thread rrodrigues at poli dot ufrj.br
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913 --- Comment #7 from Rodrigo Rodrigues --- Here goes the backtrack: #0 0x in ?? () #1 0x0042d483 in output_float_FMT_G_16 (comp_d=, zero_flag=, sign_bit=, size=, buffer=, m=, f=0x22fb6c, dtp=) at ../../../gcc-4.8.0-min

[Bug fortran/58913] Segmentation fault on real128 array

2013-10-29 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 08:02:08PM +, rrodrigues at poli dot ufrj.br wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913 > > --- Comment #5 from Rodrigo Rodrigues --- > There is no compile error. Ad

[Bug fortran/58913] Segmentation fault on real128 array

2013-10-29 Thread rrodrigues at poli dot ufrj.br
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913 --- Comment #5 from Rodrigo Rodrigues --- There is no compile error. Adding -g for running doesn't show any new information, just the same: Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation Fault - invalid memory reference. Backtrace for this error:

[Bug fortran/58913] Segmentation fault on real128 array

2013-10-29 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 07:47:36PM +, rrodrigues at poli dot ufrj.br wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913 > > --- Comment #3 from Rodrigo Rodrigues --- > Windows 7 x86 > I got gfortra

[Bug fortran/58913] Segmentation fault on real128 array

2013-10-29 Thread rrodrigues at poli dot ufrj.br
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913 --- Comment #3 from Rodrigo Rodrigues --- Windows 7 x86 I got gfortran from mingw. Actually, real128 returns 16 in my machine. It is totally equivalent to 16 here.

[Bug fortran/58913] Segmentation fault on real128 array

2013-10-29 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #1) > What operating system? Where did you get gfortran? > > Your program works for 4.7.4, 4.8.2, and trunk on > x86_64 FreeBSD I take it back. Your program does n

[Bug fortran/58913] Segmentation fault on real128 array

2013-10-29 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org