http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58998
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58998
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Dec 31 14:02:04 2013
New Revision: 206266
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206266&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-12-31 Janus Weil
Backport from mainline
2013-12-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58998
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Dec 30 17:33:21 2013
New Revision: 206249
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206249&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-12-30 Janus Weil
PR fortran/58998
* resolve.c (re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58998
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #7)
> I propose the following patch:
... which regtests cleanly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58998
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58998
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> The changed appeared between r185913 (2012-03-28, no error) and r186417
> (2012-04-13, error).
Thanks for narrowing it down so sharply, Dominique
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58998
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #4)
> The most suspicious commit I can see in that range is r186318, which was
> Tobias' fix for PR52729.
Indeed reverting this commit makes the error go away for com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58998
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> The changed appeared between r185913 (2012-03-28, no error) and r186417
> (2012-04-13, error).
The most suspicious commit I can see in that range
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58998
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
According to the c.l.f. discussion, the 'iargc' reference inside the function
'iargc_8' does not refer to the generic interface, but to an external function.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58998
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58998
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58998
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
12 matches
Mail list logo
