[Bug fortran/61627] specification expression ICE with version 4.7.1 and 4.8.2, incorrect output with 4.4.7 and 4.9.0

2018-03-08 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61627 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/61627] specification expression ICE with version 4.7.1 and 4.8.2, incorrect output with 4.4.7 and 4.9.0

2018-03-08 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61627 --- Comment #5 from Harald Anlauf --- This one appears to have been solved along with the fix for pr64124/pr70409. Close as duplicate?

[Bug fortran/61627] specification expression ICE with version 4.7.1 and 4.8.2, incorrect output with 4.4.7 and 4.9.0

2018-01-23 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61627 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #4

[Bug fortran/61627] specification expression ICE with version 4.7.1 and 4.8.2, incorrect output with 4.4.7 and 4.9.0

2016-04-02 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61627 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/61627] specification expression ICE with version 4.7.1 and 4.8.2, incorrect output with 4.4.7 and 4.9.0

2014-07-01 Thread harper at msor dot vuw.ac.nz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61627 --- Comment #2 from harper at msor dot vuw.ac.nz --- My diagnosis of the gfortran 4.9.0 error was misleading. Len(head1) was not 1 as I had thought but 3, so the wrong output may have been due to the initialization or the write statement, as the

[Bug fortran/61627] specification expression ICE with version 4.7.1 and 4.8.2, incorrect output with 4.4.7 and 4.9.0

2014-06-29 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61627 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW