https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67509
--- Comment #7 from Bill Seurer ---
It does not appear this patch was ever submitted as this test is still failing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67509
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67509
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab ---
With that patch the test passes on all opt levels.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67509
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67509
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
37 307 291
3.40282347E+38 1.7976931348623157E+308
8.98846567431157953864652595394512367E+0307
1.17549435E-38 2.2250738585072014E-308
2.00416836000897277799610805135016
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67509
--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to Pat Haugen from comment #2)
> I see the same thing on both powerpc64/powerpc64le:
>
> pthaugen@genoa:~$ ~/install/gcc/trunk/bin/gfortran z.f90 && ./a.out
>4 8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67509
--- Comment #2 from Pat Haugen ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #1)
> Thanks Andreas for reporting this. Could you please compile and run the
> following Fortran source, and paste the output here? It's been a long time
> sinc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67509
--- Comment #1 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Thanks Andreas for reporting this. Could you please compile and run the
following Fortran source, and paste the output here? It's been a long time
since I have used a ppc machine (and it was a darwi
