[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 --- Comment #24 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Jan 10 12:56:28 2016 New Revision: 232200 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232200=gcc=rev Log: 2016-01-10 Paul Thomas PR fortran/67779 *

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 --- Comment #26 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Jan 10 18:06:43 2016 New Revision: 232203 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232203=gcc=rev Log: 2016-01-10 Paul Thomas Backport from mainline.

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 Bug 67779 depends on bug 69011, which changed state. Bug 69011 Summary: [6 Regression] [OOP] ICE in gfc_advance_chain for ALLOCATE with SOURCE https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69011 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 --- Comment #23 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #21) > the right patch this time Works well, looks obvious. Pre-approved if you don't think it is, in fact, obvious :-)

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 --- Comment #19 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 37198 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37198=edit Patch to fix the problem The attached fixes all versions of the problem and regtests OK on FC21/x86_64. I would

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #37198|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 --- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Created attachment 37198 [details] > Patch to fix the problem > > The attached fixes all versions of the problem and regtests OK on FC21/x86_64. Are you sure you attached the right patch to the

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 --- Comment #22 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Created attachment 37201 [details] > the right patch this time Works as expected without regression!

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 --- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig --- The error occurs for class arrays only. Changing class(myclass), dimension(:) :: array to type(mysortable), dimension(:) :: array in the more simplified test case results in correct behavior.

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 --- Comment #17 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Now sorting the right-hand part of the array fails: Confirmed, starting with 2 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 10

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 --- Comment #18 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- It works for me - a mystery for tomorrow :-) Paul On 29 December 2015 at 23:10, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: >

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 --- Comment #16 from Thomas Koenig --- Created attachment 37190 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37190=edit Test case that still fails Hi Paul, > (i) To fix the ICE in trans.c. This is fixed by the change to trans-stmt.c. >

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 --- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #11) > Created attachment 37182 [details] > More simplified test case > > This illustrates the problem - the array is passed wrong on > the first call to the

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 --- Comment #12 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- That rings a bell. I feel like already have done some work on a similar issue. I will take a look, when I have some time left.

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig --- Created attachment 37182 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37182=edit More simplified test case This illustrates the problem - the array is passed wrong on the first call to the

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 --- Comment #9 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- PR69011 is probably a duplicate.

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 --- Comment #7 from Arjen Markus --- Yes, I can confirm this - I also tried with the Intel Fortran compiler and that sorts the integers and strings in the way one would expect.

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The problem is not limited to strings. If I add the following lines array(1)%value = 2 array(9)%value = 10 write( string_array(1)%value, '(a,i0)' ) "String = ", 2

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Apparently there is a nasty bug somewhere: if I sort 'String = 2 ' 'String = 9 ' 'String = 8 ' 'String = 7 '

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I have instrumented the test and found that 'String = 10 ', which at the first position, is compared only once at the first call to quick sort, but not for the other invocations of array(1:j).

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 --- Comment #3 from Arjen Markus --- Let me clarify: the STRING "String = 10" should come after the STRING "String = 1 ". It is not a matter of the numbers inside. If you compare these strings with LLT(), you will see this.

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 Gerhard Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added CC|