[Bug fortran/68243] QOI: no warning about unused entities in submodules

2015-11-20 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68243 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/68243] QOI: no warning about unused entities in submodules

2015-11-19 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68243 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > Confirmed. Isn't this testcase a demonstration that unused3 and unused4 can be used outside of m2? module m1 implicit none private interface

[Bug fortran/68243] QOI: no warning about unused entities in submodules

2015-11-08 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68243 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #2) > That's a wierd one! I'll take a look later on. I presume that I have to lay out the common block with the pointer and the string length variable together? It's the

[Bug fortran/68243] QOI: no warning about unused entities in submodules

2015-11-08 Thread paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68243 --- Comment #4 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Sorry! Wrong PR. On 8 November 2015 at 11:18, pault at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68243 > > --- Comment #3

[Bug fortran/68243] QOI: no warning about unused entities in submodules

2015-11-07 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68243 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/68243] QOI: no warning about unused entities in submodules

2015-11-07 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68243 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|