[Bug fortran/68649] [6/7 Regression] note: code may be misoptimized unless -fno-strict-aliasing is used

2016-12-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68649 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/68649] [6/7 Regression] note: code may be misoptimized unless -fno-strict-aliasing is used

2016-10-18 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68649 --- Comment #18 from Joost VandeVondele --- since this PR, and the related PR77278 can presumably only be fixed by changing libgfortran abi (at least if I understand Richard's suggestion for fixing this). The announced major version bump of

[Bug fortran/68649] [6/7 Regression] note: code may be misoptimized unless -fno-strict-aliasing is used

2016-08-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68649 --- Comment #17 from Richard Biener --- GCC 6.2 is being released, adjusting target milestone.

[Bug fortran/68649] [6/7 Regression] note: code may be misoptimized unless -fno-strict-aliasing is used

2016-08-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68649 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3 --- Comment #15 from Richard

[Bug fortran/68649] [6/7 Regression] note: code may be misoptimized unless -fno-strict-aliasing is used

2016-04-27 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68649 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|6.0 |6.2 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek