https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69101
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69101
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #9 from F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69101
--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #7)
> > I believe that one should force type conversion in
> > external_spec_function. All valid values fit in
> > a REAL(4). The only problem might be integer
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69101
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> I believe that one should force type conversion in
> external_spec_function. All valid values fit in
> a REAL(4). The only problem might be integer
> wrap-around semantics.
Bummer that doesn'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69101
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #5)
> (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #4)
> > I was looking at this yesterday. It is implemented in ieee_arithmetic.F90
> > and I think can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69101
--- Comment #5 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #4)
> I was looking at this yesterday. It is implemented in ieee_arithmetic.F90
> and I think can be done with generic type bound procedures.
There's also a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69101
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69101
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
