https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:794af0d00b7086c9f0493f3a1aaac644e1fd50f6
commit r13-4851-g794af0d00b7086c9f0493f3a1aaac644e1fd50f6
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> The patch in comment 7 no longer applies: 'ts.type == BT_DERIVED' has been
> replaced with 'ts.type == BT_DERIVED'. Updating the patch along this line
> does not remove the ICE!-(
Read "replaced wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604
--- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The patch in comment 7 no longer applies: 'ts.type == BT_DERIVED' has been
replaced with 'ts.type == BT_DERIVED'. Updating the patch along this line does
not remove the ICE!-(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604
--- Comment #12 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #11)
> While reducing PR 78290, I found another example giving a similar traceback:
>
> % gfc-trunk gfcbug136.f90
[...]
While checking the status of the example in c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604
--- Comment #11 from Harald Anlauf ---
While reducing PR 78290, I found another example giving a similar traceback:
% gfc-trunk gfcbug136.f90
gfcbug136.f90:13:0:
ip=>ta%i !!! Works if you comment this line out !!!
internal compiler error: i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604
Vittorio Zecca changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zeccav at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604
--- Comment #9 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Update, using fresh new release gfortran-6 --version
GNU Fortran (SUSE Linux) 6.1.0 20160427 [gcc-6-branch revision 235475]
The error message has changed :
$ gfortran-6 -c z1.f90
internal compiler er
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604
--- Comment #8 from Harald Anlauf ---
Independent of the modification in comment #7, there is an issue
with wrong code for the native complex type. Consider:
program p
complex :: z[*], w = 1
real:: x[*], y = 2
type t
complex :: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604
--- Comment #7 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #6)
All crashes for case 4 go away after the following change:
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
===
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604
--- Comment #6 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #5)
> The problem in case for is in the l.h.s. of the assignment, not the r.h.s:
Even simpler, it's just the complex assignment:
program p
complex :: z[*], w = 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604
--- Comment #4 from Harald Anlauf ---
Cases z1, z2 are invalid codes:
ifort:
pr69604-z1.f90(2): error #6579: A dummy argument of a statement function is
invalid in this context. [N]
x(n) = n()
--^
compilation aborted for pr69604-z1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604
--- Comment #5 from Harald Anlauf ---
The problem in case for is in the l.h.s. of the assignment, not the r.h.s:
program p
complex :: z[*]
real:: x[*], y
! z = x / cmplx(0.0, x)
z = 1 / cmplx(y)
end
pr69604-z4.f90:5:0:
z = 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
While playing around, one example from ./gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/
shows the same error with v6.0.0, but not with v5.3.1 :
$ gfortran-6 -c complex_intrinsic_6.f90
internal compiler error: in gfc_add_
17 matches
Mail list logo
