https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71687
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71687
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Jul 2 10:25:52 2016
New Revision: 237944
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237944&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-07-01 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71687
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jul 1 20:52:54 2016
New Revision: 237926
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237926&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/71687
* f95-lang.c (struct binding_level): Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71687
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71687
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71687
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
As known, case above works with "workshare" :
$ cat z2.f90
subroutine s (n, x)
integer :: n
real :: x(n)
!$omp parallel workshare
x(1:n) = x(n:1:-1)
!$omp end parallel workshare
end