[Bug fortran/77505] Negative character length not treated as LEN=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77505 --- Comment #12 from Elizebeth Punnoose --- (In reply to kargl from comment #11) > Fixed on trunk. Closing. > > Elizebeth, Thanks for the patch. Thank you.

[Bug fortran/77505] Negative character length not treated as LEN=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77505 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/77505] Negative character length not treated as LEN=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77505 --- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Dec 1 23:11:35 2016 New Revision: 243143 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243143=gcc=rev Log: 2016-12-01 Elizebeth Punnoose PR

[Bug fortran/77505] Negative character length not treated as LEN=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77505 --- Comment #9 from Elizebeth Punnoose --- (In reply to Janne Blomqvist from comment #8) > (In reply to Elizebeth Punnoose from comment #6) > > Modified code with the warning message moved behind -fcheck=bounds. > > > > Index: trans-array.c > >

[Bug fortran/77505] Negative character length not treated as LEN=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77505 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug fortran/77505] Negative character length not treated as LEN=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77505 --- Comment #7 from Elizebeth Punnoose --- I plan to send the patch to gcc-patches from my official mail id, in a couple of days. Please do let me know if there are any suggestions/comments.

[Bug fortran/77505] Negative character length not treated as LEN=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77505 --- Comment #6 from Elizebeth Punnoose --- Modified code with the warning message moved behind -fcheck=bounds. Index: trans-array.c === --- trans-array.c (revision 241960)

[Bug fortran/77505] Negative character length not treated as LEN=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77505 --- Comment #5 from Elizebeth Punnoose --- Hi Steve, To answer your first question, I am covered by the HPE corporate assignment. When posting the patch, I will be doing so from my corporate email id. The Fortran 2008 standards page at

[Bug fortran/77505] Negative character length not treated as LEN=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77505 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl --- On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 04:49:49AM +, elizebethp at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77505 > > Elizebeth Punnoose changed: > Hi Elizebeth, Just an administrative

[Bug fortran/77505] Negative character length not treated as LEN=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77505 Elizebeth Punnoose changed: What|Removed |Added CC||elizebethp at gmail dot com ---

[Bug fortran/77505] Negative character length not treated as LEN=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77505 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Severity|minor

[Bug fortran/77505] Negative character length not treated as LEN=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77505 --- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 07:01:40PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > --- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- > This is going to require someone smarting than I to fix. > The problem lies in

[Bug fortran/77505] Negative character length not treated as LEN=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77505 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|