[Bug fortran/78443] [OOP] Incorrect behavior with non_overridable keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78443 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/78443] [OOP] Incorrect behavior with non_overridable keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78443 --- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Sun Dec 4 16:34:13 2016 New Revision: 243230 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243230=gcc=rev Log: 2016-12-04 Janus Weil Backport from trunk

[Bug fortran/78443] [OOP] Incorrect behavior with non_overridable keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78443 --- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Sun Dec 4 16:00:27 2016 New Revision: 243229 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243229=gcc=rev Log: 2016-12-04 Janus Weil Backport from trunk

[Bug fortran/78443] [OOP] Incorrect behavior with non_overridable keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78443 --- Comment #11 from federico --- Janus, sure - please take your time! Opening a new ticket for this further issue. Thanks, Federico

[Bug fortran/78443] [OOP] Incorrect behavior with non_overridable keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78443 --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to federico from comment #9) > I have attached another minimal test to show the compiler's behavior. > Maybe your fix also fixes this? Thanks for this new test case, Federico.

[Bug fortran/78443] [OOP] Incorrect behavior with non_overridable keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78443 --- Comment #9 from federico --- Janus, thanks for your hard work! I'm sorry to post another bug / possibly further evidence of the same bug. When the non_overridable function is part of a generic set, and the generic binding is called

[Bug fortran/78443] [OOP] Incorrect behavior with non_overridable keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78443 --- Comment #8 from federico --- Created attachment 40127 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40127=edit Minimal program to test non_overridable functions in generic type-bound set

[Bug fortran/78443] [OOP] Incorrect behavior with non_overridable keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78443 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.5 --- Comment #7 from janus

[Bug fortran/78443] [OOP] Incorrect behavior with non_overridable keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78443 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Tue Nov 22 16:06:46 2016 New Revision: 242703 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242703=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-22 Janus Weil PR fortran/78443

[Bug fortran/78443] [OOP] Incorrect behavior with non_overridable keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78443 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrestelli at gmail dot com

[Bug fortran/78443] [OOP] Incorrect behavior with non_overridable keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78443 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/78443] [OOP] Incorrect behavior with non_overridable keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78443 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/78443] [OOP] Incorrect behavior with non_overridable keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78443 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Indeed this behavior is a bug. Looking at the dump generated with -fdump-tree-original, it seems that all typebound-procedure calls are generated as they should be: * The three calls in the main

[Bug fortran/78443] [OOP] Incorrect behavior with non_overridable keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78443 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code