[Bug fortran/80484] Three syntax errors involving derived-type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80484 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/80484] Three syntax errors involving derived-type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80484 --- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu May 4 18:45:50 2017 New Revision: 247615 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247615=gcc=rev Log: 2017-05-04 Jerry DeLisle Backport from

[Bug fortran/80484] Three syntax errors involving derived-type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80484 --- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle --- Fixed on trunk, will backport to 7 as soon as permitted.

[Bug fortran/80484] Three syntax errors involving derived-type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80484 --- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun Apr 23 15:49:16 2017 New Revision: 247084 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247084=gcc=rev Log: 2017-04-23 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/80484

[Bug fortran/80484] Three syntax errors involving derived-type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80484 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Comment #12 from Jerry

[Bug fortran/80484] Three syntax errors involving derived-type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80484 --- Comment #11 from Walt Brainerd --- Looks good. Great work. You have done more than your share today to make the Fortran world a better place. Thanks! On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 2:32 PM, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org>

[Bug fortran/80484] Three syntax errors involving derived-type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80484 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Walt Brainerd from comment #9) > Just FYI, Intel 2017 compiles 3DT'...', but it does not run correctly > (response inspired by your comments about a similar possibility :-). > Seems to run OK

[Bug fortran/80484] Three syntax errors involving derived-type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80484 --- Comment #9 from Walt Brainerd --- Just FYI, Intel 2017 compiles 3DT'...', but it does not run correctly (response inspired by your comments about a similar possibility :-). On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 12:35 PM, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org <

[Bug fortran/80484] Three syntax errors involving derived-type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80484 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle --- Regarding: use dt_write_mod, only: B_type, write (formatted) This works: use dt_write_mod, only: B_type It seems to me that since write (formatted) is a special instance of an interface defined by

[Bug fortran/80484] Three syntax errors involving derived-type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80484 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle --- Created attachment 41246 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41246=edit Preliminary patch for testing This patch takes care of the rejected format with a repeat in front of the DT and the

[Bug fortran/80484] Three syntax errors involving derived-type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80484 --- Comment #6 from Walt Brainerd --- I have added a complete program as an attachment to the bug report (I think). See comments in the program. Pls let me know if there is something missing. On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 7:27 PM, jvdelisle at gcc

[Bug fortran/80484] Three syntax errors involving derived-type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80484 Walt Brainerd changed: What|Removed |Added CC||walt.brainerd at gmail dot com ---

[Bug fortran/80484] Three syntax errors involving derived-type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80484 --- Comment #4 from Walt Brainerd --- OK, but it will take me some time to cut the thing down from the several hundred lines that do the formatting. Not hard to do, just will take a bit to get a good example. Thanks for looking at this. On

[Bug fortran/80484] Three syntax errors involving derived-type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80484 --- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle --- As an example of what I just said: $ gfc pr80484.f03 f951: internal compiler error: in gfc_match_use, at fortran/module.c:689 With no module defined. This is an unrelated bug I just stumbled on... with

[Bug fortran/80484] Three syntax errors involving derived-type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80484 --- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Walt Brainerd from comment #0) > Windows 10, gcc 7.0.1 20170416 > > If the commented versions of the USE or WRITE statements > are used, the program works fine. > > The function B converts

[Bug fortran/80484] Three syntax errors involving derived-type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80484 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|