https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80610
--- Comment #17 from Gustavo Hime ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #12)
Dear Jerry,
Thank you for the feedback.
For the record, I didn't say gfortran is crap, nor did I throw insults at it.
At least I didn't mean to. Sorry if you mis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80610
--- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Results on a Corei7 2.8Ghz with 16Gb of RAM
for 512^3
% time gfc pr80610_db.f90 -finit-real=nan
329.364u 16.328s 5:58.24 96.4% 0+0k 3+1197io 599275pf+0w
% ll ./a.out
-rwxr-xr-x 1 dominiq staff 536
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80610
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||memory-hog
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80610
--- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #13)
> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 04:59:10AM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> >
> > Yes that will take some frontend magic and we have so few people to support
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80610
--- Comment #13 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 04:59:10AM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> Yes that will take some frontend magic and we have so few people to support
> gfortran (for free remember) that we may not be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80610
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80610
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
Basically to initialize all of the values of a static array, the array is
stored in gfortan memory. To do a 1GB array, you need at least 32times that
amount of virtual memory available. Related to bug 5667
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80610
--- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 08:31:00PM +, gustavo.hime at mpimet dot mpg.de
wrote:
>
> Are there any maintainers on the gfortran project who can see this? I am going
> to reopen the bug once more, but then I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80610
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
See https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/vm/overcommit-accounting for more
on what is going on here. This is not under the gfortran control.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80610
--- Comment #8 from Gustavo Hime ---
>
> I understand the issue. It isn't a problem with gfortran.
>
You do not understand the issue, which I made quite clear when reporting the
bug. The code compiles, links and runs if no non-zero option is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80610
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80610
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 08:07:17PM +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
> Resolution|INVALID |---
>
> --- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80610
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80610
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80610
Gustavo Hime changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80610
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80610
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
17 matches
Mail list logo
