https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
--- Comment #13 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Many thanks - it's like currency exchange rate variations; <1% == 0%
Cheers
Paul
On 20 September 2017 at 16:01, andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
--- Comment #12 from Andrey Guskov ---
Okay, testing complete.
The performance delta is less than 1% (0.96% to be exact), but technically the
new solution is still faster than the one before r252781.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
--- Comment #11 from Andrey Guskov ---
Sorry Paul, we happened to be lacking automatic perf runs for 187.
I`ll try running it manually and then report back.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
--- Comment #10 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Dear Andrey,
Thanks for the confirmation that the fix did the trick.
Cheers
Paul
On 15 September 2017 at 14:55, andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Guskov ---
Yep, 187 seems to be working now.
Not sure about performance, will check this next week when the automatic perf
build arrives.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Sep 15 07:26:14 2017
New Revision: 252781
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252781&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-15 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/82184
trans-decl.c (gf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
--- Comment #6 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Thanks Andrey. I'll get to it as soon as I can.
Paul
On 13 September 2017 at 21:12, andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Guskov ---
program r187
call s()
call s()
contains
subroutine s()
complex(4), allocatable, save :: a(:, :)
complex(4), pointer, save :: b(:, :)
if (.not. associated(b)) then
allocate(a(2, 2))
allocate(b(2, 2))
a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrey.y.guskov at intel dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I have reopened pr34640 due to ICEs that were not present in the latest patch I
have tested.
I don't know if this PR is the same issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Richard, I think you have access to the SPEC
sources (which no gfortran maintainer has).
Could you give us a hint of what goes wrong?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
14 matches
Mail list logo
