https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82258
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|pault at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82258
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82258
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82258
--- Comment #12 from Christophe Lyon ---
There are several differences, but I'm not fluent in fortran.
In case of doubt, note that 'armeb' means arm target in big-endian mode.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82258
--- Comment #11 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 42330
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42330&action=edit
tree dump for armeb
This is the tree-dump-original for the testcase of comment #8.
My compiler is configure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82258
--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 42254
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42254&action=edit
tree dump for testcase of comment # 9
The output in comment #9 has left me totally perplexed.
I cannot for the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82258
--- Comment #9 from Christophe Lyon ---
I get:
1 2 1 0 -2 -3
-4
3 4 5 0 7 8
9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82258
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Could you try the following program:
program try_lf0030
call LF0030(10)
end
SUBROUTINE LF0030(nf10)
INTEGER ILA1(7)
INTEGER ILA2(7)
LOGICAL LLA(:,:,:,:,:,:,:)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82258
--- Comment #7 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 4
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4&action=edit
execution traces
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82258
--- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 42221
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42221&action=edit
executable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82258
--- Comment #5 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 42220
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42220&action=edit
object file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82258
--- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 42219
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42219&action=edit
assembly file
Compiled with -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer
-finline-functions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82258
--- Comment #3 from Christophe Lyon ---
The logs are not very helpful here is what I can see in gfortran.log:
Execution timeout is: 300
spawn [open ...]^M
Program aborted. Backtrace:
qemu: uncaught target signal 6 (Aborted) - core dumped
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82258
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82258
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
15 matches
Mail list logo