https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82923
--- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas ---
>
> Added:
> trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/select_type_42.f90
> Modified:
> trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
> trunk/gcc/fortran/match.c
> trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
Sorry, this last was the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82923
--- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun May 20 09:59:54 2018
New Revision: 260413
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260413&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-19 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/82923
PR fortran/6669
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82923
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82923
--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas ---
Fixed on 7-branch through to trunk.
Thanks for the report and sorry that it took so long.
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82923
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sat May 19 14:53:58 2018
New Revision: 260399
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260399&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-19 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/82923
PR fortran/66694
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82923
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sat May 19 11:32:30 2018
New Revision: 260395
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260395&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-19 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/82923
PR fortran/66694
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82923
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sat May 19 10:49:50 2018
New Revision: 260392
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260392&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-19 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/82923
PR fortran/66694
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82923
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I can't believe that this isn't a duplicate although I can't find it. ...
PRs 66694 and 82617 are "fixed" by the patch at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2018-05/msg00046.html.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82923
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82923
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Confirmed, however I see an ICE when compiling the "type" variant of pr65381.
I have forgotten to say that the ICE is similar to the one in comment 1
pr65381_red.f90:15:0:
pure function fixed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82923
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Created attachment 42637 [details]
> Fix for the bug
>
> This one does the job and it regtests OK.
Confirmed, however I see an ICE when compiling the "type" variant of pr65381.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82923
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 42637
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42637&action=edit
Fix for the bug
This one does the job and it regtests OK. However, I'll wait until I get
PR78990 out of the way b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82923
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82923
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
14 matches
Mail list logo
