https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83076
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83076
--- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Mar 4 13:56:09 2018
New Revision: 258233
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258233&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-04 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/83076
* resolve.c (re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83076
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83076
--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jan 1 17:36:41 2018
New Revision: 256065
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256065&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-01-01 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/83076
* resolve.c (re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83076
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> "Today" got rather extended!
;-)
> I have fixed the problem with pr58793. You had better provide me with
> one or two other examples.
For
internal compiler error: in gfc_add_modify_loc, at fortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83076
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #8)
> (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #7)
> > With the patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2017-11/msg00171.html the
> > number of
> >
> > internal comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83076
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #7)
> With the patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2017-11/msg00171.html the
> number of
>
> internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:236
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83076
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
With the patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2017-11/msg00171.html the
number of
internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2368
in my test suite went from 5 without the patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83076
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 42733
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42733&action=edit
A partial fix for the PR
This fixes the testcase and, indeed, some more elaborate versions. However,
coarray_allo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83076
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Hence, I would say that it is a pre-existing problem that has been exposed
> by the fix for r254427 and is not really a regression.
Still a regression [78 Regression], likely caused by r243021.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83076
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #3)
> Yes, indeed it was the main part of my patch. I cannot see at the moment,
> though, why forcing the creation of a vtable is having this effect on caf in
> deallocate.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83076
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83076
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83076
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83076
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
15 matches
Mail list logo
