https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436
--- Comment #17 from Thomas Koenig ---
The fix will be in gcc 7.3 which is planned for release during the third week
of January according to https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-12/msg00102.html .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436
--- Comment #16 from Daan van Vugt ---
Thanks guys :) What version will this be included in?
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:36 AM, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Dec 21 10:34:35 2017
New Revision: 255940
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255940=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-12-21 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Dec 20 20:36:22 2017
New Revision: 255902
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255902=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-12-20 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/83436
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig ---
This also does not occur with 20171219.
So, my guess would be that this was a side-effect of one of
the recent patches, and was fixed in the meantime.
I will commit a test case and then close this as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
The problem went away after updating to a clean trunk,
re-bootstrapping and installing.
Let's try gcc-7 next...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436
--- Comment #10 from Daan van Vugt ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #8)
> Thanks. Can you add the -v option to the above command line
> and report the output (up to the ld line)? Do you have
> more than one version of gfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
I am also seeing this.
However, we have made some incompatible changes in the development phase
of gcc-8. (We bumped the library version only once).
This behavior could be the result of one of these
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 08:00:57PM +, daanvanvugt at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436
>
> --- Comment #7 from Daan van Vugt ---
> (In reply to kargl from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436
--- Comment #7 from Daan van Vugt ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #6)
> That is not gfortran. What happens if (1) you remove all of the
> options and (2) you actually invoke gfortran?
gfortran -g read_urandom.f90 -o read_urandom
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436
--- Comment #5 from Daan van Vugt ---
Okay, turned out I missed the critical lines in my bug report...
Could you try again with this example?
module mod_random_seed
implicit none
contains
!> Read an int from /dev/urandom
subroutine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Daan,
Works for me here. It could be that the compiler is trying to use a wrong
library version. Did you build gfortran yourself? What system are you running
on?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #1)
> I can not check this right. Jerry, van you take a look?
Looking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org,
17 matches
Mail list logo