https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84594
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|dominiq
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84594
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84594
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 04:41:00PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
>
> Do you at least agree that
>
> (a) || flag_default_real_10 || flag_default_real_16 should be added
> to flag_default_integer ||
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84594
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > (1) AFAICT this not documented. Is NUMERIC_STORAGE_SIZE the only parameter
> > in
> > ISO_FORTRAN_ENV triggering a warning?
>
> Don't know. But, it is obviously a correct warning
> as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84594
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:01:38PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84594
>
> --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > This is expected.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84594
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> This is expected.
Indeed! I have found it in module.c.
> This PR should be closed as INVALID.
(1) AFAICT this not documented. Is NUMERIC_STORAGE_SIZE the only parameter in
ISO_FORTRAN_ENV
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84594
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84594
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4