https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84922
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84922
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.4 |8.5
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84922
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84922
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.2 |8.3
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84922
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.0 |8.2
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84922
--- Comment #16 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:00:45AM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84922
>
> --- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> When compiling the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84922
--- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
When compiling the following variant
module copy
use, intrinsic :: iso_fortran_env, only : int8
interface
module subroutine copy_byte_data( data, copy ) ! Chase's copier
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84922
--- Comment #14 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Mar 22 21:42:07 2018
New Revision: 258784
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258784=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-03-22 Steven G. Kargl
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84922
--- Comment #13 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 12:44:25AM +, w.clodius at icloud dot com wrote:
> --- Comment #12 from William Clodius ---
> FWIW I was told on comp.lang.fortran that the code is erroneous because of
>
> "The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84922
--- Comment #12 from William Clodius ---
FWIW I was told on comp.lang.fortran that the code is erroneous because of
"The error message doesn't make much sense to me, but I think Note 12.2
in section 12.4.3.1 contains a clue to what's going on.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84922
--- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch submitted.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84922
--- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 01:23:32PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 08:11:29PM +, w.clodius at icloud dot com wrote:
> > --- Comment #6 from William Clodius ---
> > My version of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84922
--- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 08:15:57PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> >subroutine copy_byte_data(data, copy)
> >1
> > Error: Shape mismatch in argument 'data'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84922
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 08:11:29PM +, w.clodius at icloud dot com wrote:
> --- Comment #6 from William Clodius ---
> My version of gfortran, 7.1, doesn’t give the first message, which is correct.
> The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84922
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> My version of gfortran gives
>
> gfcx -c a.f90
> a.f90:4:38:
>
>module subroutine copy_byte_data(data, copy)
> 1
> a.f90:12:31:
>
>subroutine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84922
--- Comment #6 from William Clodius ---
My version of gfortran, 7.1, doesn’t give the first message, which is correct.
The second message is incorrect. Either the clashing procedures should not be
compared further, or the comparison of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84922
--- Comment #5 from William Clodius ---
The code is definitely invalid, but the misleading error message did result in
significant time lost by assuming the message was correct as to the problem.
Note several other attempts to fix the problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84922
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84922
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84922
--- Comment #2 from William Clodius ---
FWIW I get the same misleading message for other variants of illegal code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84922
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #1
21 matches
Mail list logo