https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87233
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87233
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #1)
> The check is easy enough to delete:
>
> diff --git a/gcc/fortran/expr.c b/gcc/fortran/expr.c
> index c5bf822cd24..a8e6dd389b0 100644
> --- a/gcc/fortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87233
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #2)
> (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #1)
> > The check is easy enough to delete:
> >
--- snip ---
> What happens with -std=f95 and -std=f2003?
>
> --
> steve
Well
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87233
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Aug 5 00:47:41 2019
New Revision: 274104
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274104&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-08-04 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from trunk
PR fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87233
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87233
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Patch submitted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-07/msg00035.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87233
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jul 14 22:52:58 2019
New Revision: 273484
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273484&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-07-14 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/87233
* expr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87233
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Fixed on trunk. I am thinking backport this to enable gfortran 9 to not reject
valid.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87233
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
