[Bug fortran/91196] Interface generated for proc with VALUE, OPTIONAL misses hidden is-present argument

2023-04-08 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91196 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug fortran/91196] Interface generated for proc with VALUE, OPTIONAL misses hidden is-present argument

2023-03-31 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91196 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/91196] Interface generated for proc with VALUE,OPTIONAL misses hidden is-present argument

2020-01-27 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91196 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/91196] Interface generated for proc with VALUE,OPTIONAL misses hidden is-present argument

2019-07-18 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91196 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus --- The problem is trans-type.c's gfc_get_function_type() which handles hidden strings but not the hidden is-present status of VALUE,OPTIONAL.

[Bug fortran/91196] Interface generated for proc with VALUE,OPTIONAL misses hidden is-present argument

2019-07-18 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91196 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus --- Cross ref: The issue came up at: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-07/msg00055.html Actually, at least the 'static' line only appears for 'containes' procedures. If they are generated