https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91716
--- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Hmm, I tried it out and built gcc-9.2.0 out of the release tar ball,
with no checking flag
and, actually the test case still ICEs, just in a different
place:
$ gfortran -c z1.f90
z1.f90:5:0:
5 | en
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91716
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #5)
> It is only a checking assert, so it goes away
> automatically when the branch is released.
Only when the branch is not built in checking mode.
> Therefore I th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91716
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91716
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91716
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Fri Sep 13 11:33:18 2019
New Revision: 275698
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275698&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-13 Bernd Edlinger
PR fortran/91716
* trans
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91716
--- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Created attachment 46877
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46877&action=edit
untested patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91716
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
Status|UNCONFI
