https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91863
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #5)
> It was my intention to commit the patch for PR91926 to 9-branch
> tonight. I take it that there was no problem with yours?
Yes, fine with me.
(I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91863
--- Comment #5 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Hi Tobias,
It was my intention to commit the patch for PR91926 to 9-branch
tonight. I take it that there was no problem with yours?
Cheers
Paul
On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 07:34, burnus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91863
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91863
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Oct 28 09:36:27 2019
New Revision: 277505
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277505&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fortran] PR91863 - fix call to bind(C) with array descriptor
Bac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91863
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Oct 28 07:33:29 2019
New Revision: 277502
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277502&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fortran] PR91863 - fix call to bind(C) with array descriptor
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91863
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91863
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
