https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92277
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92277
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92277
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Oct 31 10:06:19 2019
New Revision: 277661
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277661&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fortran] PR92277 - Fix assumed-rank array with bind(C)
gcc/fortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92277
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Nov 4 14:14:43 2019
New Revision: 277781
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277781&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport Fortran BIND(C) fixes
gcc/fortran/
Backport fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92277
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92277
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Nov 5 14:28:07 2019
New Revision: 277840
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277840&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 92208 + PR 92277 – GCC 9 follow-up fix
PR fortran/92208
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92277
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #4)
> The test case was also added to the GCC 9 branch - where it passes without
> requiring a compiler patch.
Spoke to early - it was needed for arm and aarch64 as PR
