https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92736
--- Comment #4 from Chinoune ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #3)
> On Sun, Dec 01, 2019 at 05:41:21AM +, chinoune.mehdi at hotmail dot com
> wrote:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92736
> >
> > --- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92736
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sun, Dec 01, 2019 at 05:41:21AM +, chinoune.mehdi at hotmail dot com
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92736
>
> --- Comment #2 from Chinoune ---
> (In reply to kargl from comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92736
--- Comment #2 from Chinoune ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> Not sure the code is conforming, and don't have time to
> investigate (unless someone is willing to cough up $$).
>
> Workaround 1. Remove "use m1, only : i" in submodule(m2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92736
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
