subject:"\[Bug fortran\/93365\] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran\/decl.c\:426"

[Bug fortran/93365] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:426

2020-01-31 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93365 --- Comment #12 from Steve Kargl --- On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 03:46:04PM +, markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93365 > > markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: > >>> Since I'm no longer

[Bug fortran/93365] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:426

2020-01-31 Thread markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93365 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resol

[Bug fortran/93365] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:426

2020-01-31 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93365 --- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl --- On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 08:41:29AM +, markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93365 > > markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: > >What|Re

[Bug fortran/93365] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:426

2020-01-31 Thread markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93365 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gc

[Bug fortran/93365] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:426

2020-01-30 Thread markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93365 --- Comment #8 from markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to markeggleston from comment #7) > (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #6) > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 12:36:45PM +, markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org > > wrote: > > > gfc_si

[Bug fortran/93365] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:426

2020-01-30 Thread markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93365 --- Comment #7 from markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #6) > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 12:36:45PM +, markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org > wrote: > > gfc_simplify_expr calls simplify_parameter_variable which

[Bug fortran/93365] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:426

2020-01-24 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93365 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl --- On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 12:36:45PM +, markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > gfc_simplify_expr calls simplify_parameter_variable which for zero size > arrays it creates a new gfc_expr structure with the

[Bug fortran/93365] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:426

2020-01-24 Thread markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93365 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |markeggleston at

[Bug fortran/93365] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:426

2020-01-23 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93365 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 03:37:04PM +, markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > If the parameter attribute is removed or a non zero sized array is used, the > ICE does not occur. > > The ICE occurs in g

[Bug fortran/93365] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:426

2020-01-23 Thread markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93365 --- Comment #3 from markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to markeggleston from comment #2) > f951: internal compiler error: in gfc_match_varspec, at > fortran/primary.c:2389 > 0x727097 gfc_match_varspec(gfc_expr*, int, bool, bool) >