https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ee89130c278169b18b0123316ea4745120f
commit r10-8251-g2ee89130c278169b18b0123316ea4745120f
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b3c17dfef86311a8b27b8e19854fd44cf8da29ee
commit r10-8253-gb3c17dfef86311a8b27b8e19854fd44cf8da29ee
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:78c4b06ac3df51c460de835917549c8555ee4eaf
commit r10-8252-g78c4b06ac3df51c460de835917549c8555ee4eaf
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bf5fbbbd8c9a3385c1083cc80683bdb0195b1ffc
commit r11-742-gbf5fbbbd8c9a3385c1083cc80683bdb0195b1ffc
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7deca8c0b3765787627b11387b56b97b01a8bf33
commit r11-731-g7deca8c0b3765787627b11387b56b97b01a8bf33
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090
--- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Manfred Schwarb from comment #10)
> Is there a way to get useful backtraces? "--enable-checking=yes,extra"
> seems not to be enough...
Maybe some "fortify" option or a "sanitized"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090
--- Comment #10 from Manfred Schwarb ---
I just tried to build a compiler with "-fno-omit-frame-pointer" to
get potentially better backtraces, but then the ICE vanishes ...
Is there a way to get useful backtraces? "--enable-checking=yes,extra"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090
--- Comment #9 from Manfred Schwarb ---
I sprinkled some printf's into get_unique_type_string():
XXderived->name: strlen=63;
t2345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789_123
XXdt_name: strlen=63;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090
--- Comment #8 from Manfred Schwarb ---
I even tried "char tmp[2*GFC_MAX_SYMBOL_LEN+800];" but it
still fails.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Manfred Schwarb from comment #5)
> gdb shows:
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0xf7aa5162 in __strlen_sse2_bsf () from /lib/libc.so.6
> #0 0xf7aa5162 in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090
--- Comment #5 from Manfred Schwarb ---
gdb shows:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0xf7aa5162 in __strlen_sse2_bsf () from /lib/libc.so.6
#0 0xf7aa5162 in __strlen_sse2_bsf () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x083e6def in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090
Manfred Schwarb changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manfred99 at gmx dot ch
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c949ec9c4e88d2ff6dbd5b179abddf3703129577
commit r11-670-gc949ec9c4e88d2ff6dbd5b179abddf3703129577
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-26
17 matches
Mail list logo
