[Bug fortran/95530] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/equiv_11.f90 after r11-594

2020-06-05 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSI

[Bug fortran/95530] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/equiv_11.f90 after r11-594

2020-06-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:075bec57a1c63a1b1de9d95909866a6548380390 commit r9-8654-g075bec57a1c63a1b1de9d95909866a6548380390 Author: Harald Anlauf Da

[Bug fortran/95530] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/equiv_11.f90 after r11-594

2020-06-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:36442ee216acbe9a345ae625be53efbde8626477 commit r10-8254-g36442ee216acbe9a345ae625be53efbde8626477 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/95530] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/equiv_11.f90 after r11-594

2020-06-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bcd96c9cce962ca5b2c6f8459597fb759f945ccf commit r11-1009-gbcd96c9cce962ca5b2c6f8459597fb759f945ccf Author: Harald Anlauf Date: F

[Bug fortran/95530] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/equiv_11.f90 after r11-594

2020-06-05 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 --- Comment #11 from anlau

[Bug fortran/95530] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/equiv_11.f90 after r11-594

2020-06-04 Thread seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530 --- Comment #10 from Bill Seurer --- The combined patch cleans up the ICEs for both issues.

[Bug fortran/95530] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/equiv_11.f90 after r11-594

2020-06-04 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530 --- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 48679 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48679&action=edit Joint patch to fix the fallout reported in pr95530 and pr95537 Here's a clean patch that should fix

[Bug fortran/95530] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/equiv_11.f90 after r11-594

2020-06-04 Thread seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530 --- Comment #8 from Bill Seurer --- Oops, no, they are different. But this one works.

[Bug fortran/95530] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/equiv_11.f90 after r11-594

2020-06-04 Thread seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530 --- Comment #7 from Bill Seurer --- The fortran.h patch (which looks to be the same one you asked about in pr95537) works here: make -k check-gcc-fortran RUNTESTFLAGS=dg.exp=gfortran.dg/equiv_11.f90 # of expected passes3

[Bug fortran/95530] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/equiv_11.f90 after r11-594

2020-06-04 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|u

[Bug fortran/95530] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/equiv_11.f90 after r11-594

2020-06-04 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/95530] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/equiv_11.f90 after r11-594

2020-06-04 Thread seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530 --- Comment #4 from Bill Seurer --- Note that I did this run on a power 9 LE system.

[Bug fortran/95530] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/equiv_11.f90 after r11-594

2020-06-04 Thread seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530 --- Comment #3 from Bill Seurer --- The debug build did not ICE. Going back to a normal build and running f951 in gdb I see: (gdb) run /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/equiv_11.f90 -quiet -dumpbase equiv_11.f90 -dumpbase-

[Bug fortran/95530] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/equiv_11.f90 after r11-594

2020-06-04 Thread seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530 --- Comment #2 from Bill Seurer --- The above is all the traceback a normal compiler build provided. I will try building a debug version.

[Bug fortran/95530] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/equiv_11.f90 after r11-594

2020-06-04 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530 --- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Are you able to produce a traceback? valgrind unfortunately does not provide any hints.

[Bug fortran/95530] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/equiv_11.f90 after r11-594

2020-06-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0