[Bug fortran/96087] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1575

2020-07-07 Thread gs...@t-online.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96087 --- Comment #3 from G. Steinmetz --- Thanks for nailing down the commit for addon comment 1. But when started the regression/issue from comment 0 ? gfortran 9.3 does not have the ICE.

[Bug fortran/96087] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1575

2020-07-07 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96087 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/96087] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1575

2020-07-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96087 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/96087] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1575

2020-07-06 Thread gs...@t-online.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96087 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #1 from G.