https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96158
--- Comment #5 from AJM ---
Also, in case it wasn't clear,
> Breakpoint 2, boo () at a.f90:9
> 9 write(*, '(A, I3)') "moduleVar=", n
> (gdb) p n
> $2 = 123
> (gdb) p moduleVar
> No symbol "moduleVar" in current context.
> (gdb) p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96158
--- Comment #4 from AJM ---
>> I won't comment on the questionable programming idiom of placing
>> a common block in a module, which kind of defeats the niceties of
>> a module.
> If somebody wants to transition your code from using common
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96158
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #2)
> I won't comment on the questionable programming idiom of placing
> a common block in a module, which kind of defeats the niceties of
> a module.
If somebody wants to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96158
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96158
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
