https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96859
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96859
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96859
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #13 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96859
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e24dbeeb7864dc4c673f57383c3fa329d1d16e71
commit r10-8729-ge24dbeeb7864dc4c673f57383c3fa329d1d16e71
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96859
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b567d3bd302933adb253aba9069fd8120c485441
commit r11-2978-gb567d3bd302933adb253aba9069fd8120c485441
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96859
--- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 03:20:20PM +, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96859
>
> --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> I've read that. But I think in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96859
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I've read that. But I think in this case it is an obvious bug (just, what I've
missed in the patch, there is another copy of the same bug in another routine).
The
/* Clear first bit. */
if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96859
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 12:52:49PM +, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> I think this boils down to:
> program foo
> print *, int(o'1234567',2),
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96859
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96859
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Untested fix:
--- gcc/fortran/check.c.jj 2020-08-24 10:00:01.424256990 +0200
+++ gcc/fortran/check.c 2020-09-01 15:06:45.428938642 +0200
@@ -429,9 +429,9 @@ gfc_boz2int (gfc_expr *x, int kind)
/*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96859
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96859
--- Comment #4 from zhen...@compiler-dev.com ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #2)
> gfortran appears to be correct. Writing an actual program with your
> examples, I have
>
> program foo
>print '(I0,1X,I0)', &
>&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96859
--- Comment #3 from zhen...@compiler-dev.com ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> What results do you expect?
merge_bits(32767_2, o'1234567', 32767_2)
merge_bits(o'1234567', 32767_2, o'1234567')
merge_bits(32767_2,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96859
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96859
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-31
15 matches
Mail list logo
