https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96886
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96886
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96886
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Andy May from comment #0)
> Looks like a regression between 10.1.0 and 10.2.0. test.f90:
I think that's the same issue as reported in PR 94672 comment 12 last week –
which has been fixed very re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96886
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.2.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96886
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.3
Priority|P3