[Bug fortran/97224] [8/9/10/11 Regression] SPECCPU 2006 Gamess fails to build after g:e5a76af3a2f3324efc60b4b2778ffb29d5c377bc

2020-12-07 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/97224] [8/9/10/11 Regression] SPECCPU 2006 Gamess fails to build after g:e5a76af3a2f3324efc60b4b2778ffb29d5c377bc

2020-12-07 Thread tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224 --- Comment #12 from Tamar Christina --- @Martin I believe this was re-opened as the patch was reverted on master but was still pending reverts on the release branches. @Mark I assume you committed the reverts to the branches too?

[Bug fortran/97224] [8/9/10/11 Regression] SPECCPU 2006 Gamess fails to build after g:e5a76af3a2f3324efc60b4b2778ffb29d5c377bc

2020-12-04 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Sta

[Bug fortran/97224] [8/9/10/11 Regression] SPECCPU 2006 Gamess fails to build after g:e5a76af3a2f3324efc60b4b2778ffb29d5c377bc

2020-10-04 Thread drikosev at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224 --- Comment #10 from Ev Drikos --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9) > I think the two attached patches are not pertinent... Possibly, you are right. I have no access to the particular source code. > I get > > 8 | call

[Bug fortran/97224] [8/9/10/11 Regression] SPECCPU 2006 Gamess fails to build after g:e5a76af3a2f3324efc60b4b2778ffb29d5c377bc

2020-10-04 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I think the two attached patches are not pertinent: both tests use independent translation units, so they should compile. If I couple the TUs as in SUBROUTINE AIMPAC(ACO,AIC,EXPON,ICENT,ITYPE,OE,OCC

[Bug fortran/97224] [8/9/10/11 Regression] SPECCPU 2006 Gamess fails to build after g:e5a76af3a2f3324efc60b4b2778ffb29d5c377bc

2020-10-02 Thread drikosev at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224 --- Comment #8 from Ev Drikos --- Created attachment 49301 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49301&action=edit test-case with a module Hello again, Here is another test-case with a module. It's a question if this should fail

[Bug fortran/97224] [8/9/10/11 Regression] SPECCPU 2006 Gamess fails to build after g:e5a76af3a2f3324efc60b4b2778ffb29d5c377bc

2020-09-29 Thread drikosev at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224 Ev Drikos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||drikosev at gmail dot com --- Comment #7 fro

[Bug fortran/97224] [8/9/10/11 Regression] SPECCPU 2006 Gamess fails to build after g:e5a76af3a2f3324efc60b4b2778ffb29d5c377bc

2020-09-28 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl --- On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 09:48:13AM +, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224 > > Bug ID: 97224 >Summary: [8/9/10/11 Regression] SPEC

[Bug fortran/97224] [8/9/10/11 Regression] SPECCPU 2006 Gamess fails to build after g:e5a76af3a2f3324efc60b4b2778ffb29d5c377bc

2020-09-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.5 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/97224] [8/9/10/11 Regression] SPECCPU 2006 Gamess fails to build after g:e5a76af3a2f3324efc60b4b2778ffb29d5c377bc

2020-09-28 Thread mark.eggleston at codethink dot co.uk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224 --- Comment #5 from mark.eggleston at codethink dot co.uk --- in progress... On 28/09/2020 11:43, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224 > > Jakub Jelinek changed: > > What|Removed

[Bug fortran/97224] [8/9/10/11 Regression] SPECCPU 2006 Gamess fails to build after g:e5a76af3a2f3324efc60b4b2778ffb29d5c377bc

2020-09-28 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug fortran/97224] [8/9/10/11 Regression] SPECCPU 2006 Gamess fails to build after g:e5a76af3a2f3324efc60b4b2778ffb29d5c377bc

2020-09-28 Thread tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224 --- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina --- Cheers, thanks Mark!

[Bug fortran/97224] [8/9/10/11 Regression] SPECCPU 2006 Gamess fails to build after g:e5a76af3a2f3324efc60b4b2778ffb29d5c377bc

2020-09-28 Thread markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resol

[Bug fortran/97224] [8/9/10/11 Regression] SPECCPU 2006 Gamess fails to build after g:e5a76af3a2f3324efc60b4b2778ffb29d5c377bc

2020-09-28 Thread mark.eggleston at codethink dot co.uk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224 --- Comment #1 from mark.eggleston at codethink dot co.uk --- Reverting changes clearly addition test cases are required regards, Mark On 28/09/2020 10:48, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9