https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224
--- Comment #12 from Tamar Christina ---
@Martin I believe this was re-opened as the patch was reverted on master but
was still pending reverts on the release branches.
@Mark I assume you committed the reverts to the branches too?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224
--- Comment #10 from Ev Drikos ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9)
> I think the two attached patches are not pertinent...
Possibly, you are right. I have no access to the
particular source code.
> I get
>
> 8 | call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I think the two attached patches are not pertinent: both tests use independent
translation units, so they should compile.
If I couple the TUs as in
SUBROUTINE AIMPAC(ACO,AIC,EXPON,ICENT,ITYPE,OE,OCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224
--- Comment #8 from Ev Drikos ---
Created attachment 49301
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49301&action=edit
test-case with a module
Hello again,
Here is another test-case with a module.
It's a question if this should fail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224
Ev Drikos changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||drikosev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 09:48:13AM +, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224
>
> Bug ID: 97224
>Summary: [8/9/10/11 Regression] SPEC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224
--- Comment #5 from mark.eggleston at codethink dot co.uk ---
in progress...
On 28/09/2020 11:43, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
> What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224
--- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina ---
Cheers, thanks Mark!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224
markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224
--- Comment #1 from mark.eggleston at codethink dot co.uk ---
Reverting changes clearly addition test cases are required
regards,
Mark
On 28/09/2020 10:48, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9
14 matches
Mail list logo