subject:"\[Bug fortran\/97571\] long parsing phase for simple array constructor"

[Bug fortran/97571] long parsing phase for simple array constructor

2021-08-30 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97571 --- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Rimvydas (RJ) from comment #13) > I agree that it is preferred to rewrite such look up table initialization, > however it is not always possible due to licensing restrictions

[Bug fortran/97571] long parsing phase for simple array constructor

2021-08-30 Thread rimvydas.jas at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97571 --- Comment #13 from Rimvydas (RJ) --- I agree that it is preferred to rewrite such look up table initialization, however it is not always possible due to licensing restrictions preventing making local modifications to the source code provided.

[Bug fortran/97571] long parsing phase for simple array constructor

2021-04-28 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97571 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog --- Comment

[Bug fortran/97571] long parsing phase for simple array constructor

2021-04-27 Thread molah at ucar dot edu via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97571 --- Comment #11 from Mark J Olah --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #10) > gfortran is mostly maintained by volunteers. I started fixing > bugs 2 decades ago, because gfortran was the only Fortran compiler > available for FreeBSD. I no

[Bug fortran/97571] long parsing phase for simple array constructor

2021-04-27 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97571 --- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 06:03:16PM +, molah at ucar dot edu wrote: > I would expect a compiler must do a reasonable job to compile correct Fortran > code in a reasonable amount of time. The response for

[Bug fortran/97571] long parsing phase for simple array constructor

2021-04-27 Thread molah at ucar dot edu via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97571 --- Comment #9 from Mark J Olah --- Thank you Karl and Jerry for the suggestions on transforming the code. It is not my own code, and I cannot modify it. It is however correct Fortran code, that currently builds fine with GCC 10.2.0, and all

[Bug fortran/97571] long parsing phase for simple array constructor

2021-04-23 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97571 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/97571] long parsing phase for simple array constructor

2021-04-23 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97571 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/97571] long parsing phase for simple array constructor

2021-04-23 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97571 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Mark J Olah from comment #5) > Whatever is happening inside the AST evaluation in this case is not only > extraordinarily inefficient, but also apparently exponential with the size >

[Bug fortran/97571] long parsing phase for simple array constructor

2021-04-23 Thread molah at ucar dot edu via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97571 --- Comment #5 from Mark J Olah --- I reported this in bug #100235, where it was suggested this would be treated as WONTFIX. It seems this bug is reporting on the same issue arising from rttov:

[Bug fortran/97571] long parsing phase for simple array constructor

2021-04-23 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97571 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||molah at ucar dot edu ---

[Bug fortran/97571] long parsing phase for simple array constructor

2020-12-02 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97571 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2) > > So the new compiler does compile-time simplification already at -O0, > > while older versions maybe not. > > Is this expected? Depends.