https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97896
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #7)
> Well, it doesn’t fix comment #5. :-(
Pilot error, it does fix it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97896
--- Comment #7 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #6)
> rough patch
>
Well, it doesn’t fix comment #5. :-(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97896
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Morin ---
Created attachment 49609
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49609&action=edit
rough patch
OK, I understand better the problem.
It’s not a bug that the kind argument is not used to produce co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97896
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #4)
> Elemental actual arguments are some of those arrays involved.
> Obviously one should not remove some of them in the middle of code
> generation.
> It sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97896
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97896
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #2)
> Reverting the following snippet from my fix attempt for pr91651:
That snippet is necessary for the scalarizer during simplification.
The original ICE is comi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97896
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97896
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97896
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-18
Status|UNC
