[Bug fortran/98010] [OpenACC] 'gcc/fortran/options.c:gfc_post_options' should consider 'flag_openacc' in addition to 'flag_openmp'?

2020-11-30 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98010 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/98010] [OpenACC] 'gcc/fortran/options.c:gfc_post_options' should consider 'flag_openacc' in addition to 'flag_openmp'?

2020-11-30 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98010 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f4e7ea81d1369d4d6cb6d8e440aefb3407142e05 commit r11-5571-gf4e7ea81d1369d4d6cb6d8e440aefb3407142e05 Author: Tobias Burnus Date: Mo

[Bug fortran/98010] [OpenACC] 'gcc/fortran/options.c:gfc_post_options' should consider 'flag_openacc' in addition to 'flag_openmp'?

2020-11-26 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98010 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus --- Those flags are about implicitly regarding variables as 'SAVE' (i.e. resisting in static memory); this feature clashes with calling procedures recursively or concurrent; the latter affects OpenMP and OpenACC