https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98445
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98445
--- Comment #3 from Rich Townsend ---
OK, my code isn't valid -- it's not permitted to pass a generic procedure name
as an actual argument. As such, gfortran is correct in its behavior.
Happy for this one to be closed -- sorry for the false alar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98445
--- Comment #2 from Rich Townsend ---
I know it's acceptable to overload a type name with one or more functions --
from 12.4.3.4.1 of the F2008 standard,
"A generic name may be the same as a derived-type name, in which case all of
the procedures
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98445
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-12-26
Status
