[Bug fortran/99145] gfortran LOOP

2021-02-20 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99145 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/99145] gfortran LOOP

2021-02-19 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99145 --- Comment #4 from Vittorio Zecca --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #3) > Initially it is creating the very large string in the frontend passes and > then via resolution and translation phases, and finally into the middle-end > and bac

[Bug fortran/99145] gfortran LOOP

2021-02-19 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99145 --- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle --- Initially it is creating the very large string in the frontend passes and then via resolution and translation phases, and finally into the middle-end and back end phases where it I am guessing the optimizers

[Bug fortran/99145] gfortran LOOP

2021-02-19 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99145 --- Comment #2 from Vittorio Zecca --- I am sorry I should have taken more time analyzing this issue. Actually it is not and infinite loop, I clocked the compilation first with the -S option, then with the -c option. The compiler takes 4'52" of r

[Bug fortran/99145] gfortran LOOP

2021-02-18 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99145 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment