[Bug fortran/99514] incorrect Error: Threadprivate at (1) isn't SAVEd ( implicit save via DATA initialization )

2021-03-15 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99514 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/99514] incorrect Error: Threadprivate at (1) isn't SAVEd ( implicit save via DATA initialization )

2021-03-12 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99514 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0655763483008a421608d059cf26c93077621a9 commit r11-7649-gd0655763483008a421608d059cf26c93077621a9 Author: Tobias Burnus Date: Fr

[Bug fortran/99514] incorrect Error: Threadprivate at (1) isn't SAVEd ( implicit save via DATA initialization )

2021-03-10 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99514 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus --- Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-March/566548.html

[Bug fortran/99514] incorrect Error: Threadprivate at (1) isn't SAVEd ( implicit save via DATA initialization )

2021-03-10 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99514 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-10 Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/99514] incorrect Error: Threadprivate at (1) isn't SAVEd ( implicit save via DATA initialization )

2021-03-10 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99514 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to markus.weil...@ipp.mpg.de from comment #0) > I believe the ifort behavior is correct here, because the initialization of > NTest via DATA causes an implicit save, which seems not to be identified