subject:"\[Bug gcov\-profile\/79891\] Wrong count of line coverage in case of gcov \-a"

[Bug gcov-profile/79891] Wrong count of line coverage in case of gcov -a

2017-05-29 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79891 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/79891] Wrong count of line coverage in case of gcov -a

2017-04-28 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79891 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 Known to fail|

[Bug gcov-profile/79891] Wrong count of line coverage in case of gcov -a

2017-04-28 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79891 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Apr 28 12:51:05 2017 New Revision: 247374 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247374&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Make gcno more precise about BBs really belonging to a line (PR gcov-profi

[Bug gcov-profile/79891] Wrong count of line coverage in case of gcov -a

2017-03-22 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79891 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug gcov-profile/79891] Wrong count of line coverage in case of gcov -a

2017-03-10 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79891 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #7) > On Fri, 10 Mar 2017, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79891 > > > > --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---

[Bug gcov-profile/79891] Wrong count of line coverage in case of gcov -a

2017-03-10 Thread rguenther at suse dot de

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79891 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 10 Mar 2017, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79891 > > --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- > Yes, the merged is the issue, but looks it's

[Bug gcov-profile/79891] Wrong count of line coverage in case of gcov -a

2017-03-10 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79891 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Yes, the merged is the issue, but looks it's created at the very beginning: test.c.004t.gimple: ... : if (false_var != 0) goto ; else goto ; : ret = 111; : goto ; : ret = 999; : D.2320 = r

[Bug gcov-profile/79891] Wrong count of line coverage in case of gcov -a

2017-03-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79891 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- The instrumentation looks ok to me, we can recover all individual BB counts from that. What is the issue is likely the association of BB 5 (the merger block of if (false_var)) with line 13. Not sure where