http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51874
--- Comment #12 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-16
07:17:15 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Thu Feb 16 07:17:03 2012
New Revision: 184300
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184300
Log:
PR go/51874
math: Don't use libc log2 a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51874
--- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-14 18:31:28 UTC ---
> --- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-02-12
> 06:04:42 UTC ---
> In current mainline I'm not aware of any test failures on Solaris. The SPARC
> Solaris sy
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51874
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #10 from Ian Lance
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51874
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-12
06:55:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I have not tested on Irix. To be honest I am far less interested in Irix than
> I am in Solaris. Can you still buy a new Irix system?
Not know I know of.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51874
--- Comment #8 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-02-12 06:05:36
UTC ---
Sorry, I should clarify that I don't see any failures on Solaris if I patch the
compiler to avoid PR 51921.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51874
--- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-02-12 06:04:42
UTC ---
In current mainline I'm not aware of any test failures on Solaris. The SPARC
Solaris system I am using is very slow and I do see some timeouts. However, I
do not see any more actu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51874
--- Comment #6 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-12
06:00:42 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Sun Feb 12 06:00:34 2012
New Revision: 184137
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184137
Log:
PR go/51874
* go.test/go-test.exp (g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51874
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||52205
--- Comment #5 from Ian Lance Ta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51874
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-01-31 18:27:32 UTC ---
> I've still to closer investigate why this happens. I suspect that this
> is also the cause of the IRIX failures (a libgo build is currently
> running). Maybe th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51874
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-01-27 12:52:29 UTC ---
The chan.go testcase also fails on 32-bit IRIX, but in a different way:
> ./chan.x
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
Running
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51874
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-01-27 11:45:17 UTC ---
I've also had a look at the Solaris/SPARC failures, which are unrelated
to the 64-bit Solaris/x86 problem previously identified. I could trace
it to the most trivi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51874
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i386-pc-solaris2.1[01], |i386-pc-solaris2.1[01],
|
12 matches
Mail list logo
