https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393
--- Comment #17 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Thu Jul 20 22:03:48 2017
New Revision: 250403
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250403&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/81393
syscall: don't use GETREGS/SETREGS on s390
Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393
--- Comment #18 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Thu Jul 20 22:04:02 2017
New Revision: 250404
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250404&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/81393
syscall: don't use GETREGS/SETREGS on s390
Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393
--- Comment #16 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Thu Jul 20 22:03:26 2017
New Revision: 250402
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250402&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/81393
syscall: don't use GETREGS/SETREGS on s390
Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
You wrote it, so go ahead ;).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393
--- Comment #14 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Thanks. Do you want to commit or should I do it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> That is better, syscall_linux_s390.go already compiles, but
> syscall_linux_s390x.go still doesn't:
> ../../../libgo/go/syscall/syscall_linux_s390x.go:28:3: err
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That is better, syscall_linux_s390.go already compiles, but
syscall_linux_s390x.go still doesn't:
../../../libgo/go/syscall/syscall_linux_s390x.go:28:3: error: incompatible type
for field 3 in struct constru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41791|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6506/20616506/build.log
That fails to build:
../../../../libgo/go/syscall/syscall_linux_s390.go:28:33: error: reference to
undefined name 'regs'
uint32(uintp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393
--- Comment #9 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Created attachment 41791
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41791&action=edit
Possible patch
I agree that the simplest approach is to not try to pick up the definitions
from the header f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And r249663. Perhaps it would be better for the release branches to just
define the ptrace_area type in the *.go files like syscall_linux_alpha.go used
to.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Oh, and r249712.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note that the patch doesn't apply cleanly (capital vs. lowercase letter of some
field), and depends on r249472, r249662 and r250324.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393
--- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Thu Jul 13 03:44:14 2017
New Revision: 250174
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250174&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/81393
syscall: don't use GETREGS/SETREGS on s390
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41716|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
19 matches
Mail list logo
