https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30527
David changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gccbugzilla@limegreensocks.
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30527
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pi3orama at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30527
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||etienne_lorrain at yahoo dot fr
--- Com
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-21 16:37 ---
Every target have slightly different operand modifiers. They are usually
"documented" in config/*/*.md or config/*/*.c, but I think it is incorrect to
documented them for real because people will then abuse them.
--- Comment #3 from davmac at davmac dot org 2007-01-22 04:17 ---
You've got to be kidding - these things are genuinely useful. What sort of
abuse are you worried about?
In any case, I'd like to know if that is the general consensus among
maintainers. I'm not going to write documentatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30527
--- Comment #4 from Davin McCall ---
I recently stumbled across section 6.43.2.7 of the manual, which does in fact
document the operand modifiers for (and only for) x86. Modifiers for other
architectures are not documented.
