[Bug inline-asm/35160] [4.3 regression] local-alloc introduces sharing of the same pseudo/hard reg between different output regs in inline asm

2008-02-15 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #14 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-02-15 12:20 --- Testcase is fixed by http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2008-02/msg00353.html: Author: uros Date: Fri Feb 15 12:19:00 2008 New Revision: 132339 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132339 Log: * gcc.

[Bug inline-asm/35160] [4.3 regression] local-alloc introduces sharing of the same pseudo/hard reg between different output regs in inline asm

2008-02-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-13 22:25 --- Can you please submit it (or even commit as obvious)? Sorry for not thinking about this asm needing 6 regs on i?86, where it is sometimes too much. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35160

[Bug inline-asm/35160] [4.3 regression] local-alloc introduces sharing of the same pseudo/hard reg between different output regs in inline asm

2008-02-13 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-02-13 16:42 --- (In reply to comment #11) > At rev. 132272 gcc.target/i386/pr35160.c fails on i686-apple-darwin9 with: i686-apple-darwin-9 implies -fpic, so one register less is available. This is a testsuite failure, following patch fi

[Bug inline-asm/35160] [4.3 regression] local-alloc introduces sharing of the same pseudo/hard reg between different output regs in inline asm

2008-02-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #11 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-02-13 09:33 --- At rev. 132272 gcc.target/i386/pr35160.c fails on i686-apple-darwin9 with: [ibook-dhum] dominiq/Desktop% /opt/gcc/gcc4.3w/bin/gcc /opt/gcc/_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr35160.c /opt/gcc/_gcc_clean/gcc/t

[Bug inline-asm/35160] [4.3 regression] local-alloc introduces sharing of the same pseudo/hard reg between different output regs in inline asm

2008-02-13 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-02-13 08:44 --- I doubt it is a 4.3 regression. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35160